News from the Valley of the Clueless After initially more critical reporting on E10, but today I am joined to the column by an employee of the West
, where a badly researched article makes tuning for E10. Here's my response in the comments: Dear Mr.
Heidecke,
bursting Unfortunately, your post only seems like nonsense.
lags First, the comparison with the introduction of lead-free. Unleaded fuel was not nearly as controversial and the benefit was definitely understand there were even groups of vehicles, which benefit from it (two stroke). Nevertheless, even then, it has been damage to vehicles, even though they were already designed for the Australian and U.S. market (where Since the mid-80s was introduced lead-free). So many motorcycle models suffered from cracked membranes of the vacuum carburetor. At that time, only the European car industry had slept through the train, make the cars fit for unleaded. But the cylinder heads were many cars with their exhaust valves need to lead-free fuel.
Second: [quote] The driver of course interested in the first place: I ruined my car with E10? Clear answer. No [/ quote] Nice
they do it here so customer with the utter conviction. They can also allow only because they can not be with respect to prosecute claims of recourse.
fact is detrimental to the E 10 vehicles, including E 5 has done, or why they feel after each trip I empty the carburetor of my classic road racing machine? I ruined the other may not replaceable carburetor.
And what they believe, why give motorcycle brands warnings on the use of E10? Suzuki and Yamaha recommend life of over 4 weeks to remove all the fuel. Also interesting is that at Aprilia for the almost identical 650 cc Rotax engine from the Pegaso II, in contrast to the F650 from BMW, is no release for E10. The reason is not located on the engine, but the BMW is thinking of having a better legal department in case of damage claims
;-) Third, the CO2 lie. How sufficiently known, ethanol has a lower energy density than gasoline, resulting in an increased consumption of at least 2 percent. Auto Bild has revealed in a test but already, the actual consumption will be significantly higher. This talk engine concept (smaller engines with turbocharger) and the engine run worse in lower speeds, the upshift later the result with a major role here. If you have one clean, energy-emanates from lies, therefore in the bag. The nearly 5 percent consumption was defined between E5 and E10, that is, the higher regenerative portion was completely eaten up by the Merhverbrauch.
Fourth: The
with the purchase is funded by oil from Arab countries wrong, so new wrongs justified by abuse of food in any way, this argument strikes me as perverse!
Conclusion: E 10
detrimental to the motor, has a negative balance of CO2 and more expensive food and is therefore boycotted!
motorcyclists know something like that, not them!
mnemonic for you: Before you ask someone the next column idea, then write the first!
